🔗 Share this article

A former head of US economic statistics has expressed alarm that the White House moves could threaten the independence of vital economic agencies.

Dismissal Viewed as Risky Move

Erika McEntarfer, who was the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, labeled her unexpected termination as “risky” and urged the American people to pay attention to potential partisan influence in statistical reporting.

“Markets have to believe that the numbers aren't manipulated,” she emphasized. “Dismissing chief statisticians for releasing data you do not like has significant economic repercussions.”

Statistics Adjustment Came Before Termination

This bureau is responsible for gathering and releasing critical labor figures. Back in August, it adjusted downward earlier employment growth estimates for May and June by more than 250,000. Shortly after, she was dismissed.

It was the first instance a sitting commander-in-chief has dismissed the leader of the statistics agency, raising concern among experts regarding the future neutrality of the institution.

Proposed Candidate Creates Questions

Following the firing, the White House has proposed EJ Antoni, a scholar from a conservative thinktank and contributor to a conservative agenda, to lead the bureau. He has in the past questioned the Bureau of Labor Statistics and has not been confirmed by the Senate.

Currently, a longtime staff member, William Wiatrowski, is acting as acting head.

Global Examples Show Risk

McEntarfer pointed out that nations like Argentina, Greece, and Turkey have in the past faced similar political interference in statistical reporting, resulting in eroded confidence, deepened economic crises, elevated prices, and increased borrowing rates.

“Messing with economic statistics is like tampering with traffic signals,” McEntarfer explained. “Drivers don't know how to go, congestion gets worse. No one thinks it’s good for the country.”

Funding Reductions and Updates Efforts

Even her dismissal, McEntarfer had been advocating modernizing the bureau’s information collection methods. But, budget was reduced, particularly after so-called “cost-cutting” measures resulted in a 20% drop in employees.

She had hoped that after recent shifts in administration, the bureau could go back to “routine.” However, she was dismissed via a short message from the administration.

Final Thoughts

She reiterated that until the moment she was let go, the numbers produced by the bureau were accurate and free from influence. She also voiced unease about the future of other key bodies, including the central bank, which has likewise received attacks from the present administration.

“People should be able to live in a nation where you do not know who the chief data official is,” McEntarfer concluded.